Police Say Dolphins Player Arrested for Drunk Driving Had BAC Twice Legal Limit
As Miami-Dade drunk driving criminal defense attorneys, we were disappointed to read about the DUI arrest of Miami Dolphins running back Ronnie Brown. Brown, a native of Georgia, was arrested in that state March 20. The South Florida Sun-Sentinel reported March 25 that the Associated Press had a police report saying Brown’s blood-alcohol content tested at 0.158, using a breath test administered by a police officer in Marietta, Georgia. Brown, 28, was in town to attend an anniversary dinner for his parents. He has no previous arrest record, and the legal problems stemming from the arrest were not expected to stop him from playing in the NFL’s next season, or even in the offseason voluntary training that was slated to begin March 22.
According to the Miami Herald, Brown was stopped at 4:29 a.m. on March 20 for making a lane change without signaling. He and a cousin were reportedly coming home from an after-hours club. The newer Sun-Sentinel report said the officer observed Brown’s car drifting into oncoming traffic two times, one of which could have caused a crash. The officer also reported that Brown was driving at 50 to 60 mph in a 35-mph zone. Brown performed poorly on field sobriety tests and showed signs of intoxication, the officer said. Brown told the officer that he’d had foot surgery six weeks ago -- actually in November -- but had gone running the day before. The 0.158 BAC was the lower of the two readings he gave.
The report said Brown was upset about the arrest and had hired an attorney to help. As Fort Lauderdale DUI criminal defense lawyers, we think that was a very good idea. Although there is a BAC reading in this case, the other evidence in the case is weak. Despite their widespread use, field sobriety tests aren’t very reliable. Studies have shown that they can be difficult even for sober people, and when tests are considered accurate, they must still be administered properly. Similarly, the officer’s observation that Brown seemed intoxicated cannot be considered hard evidence because it is a subjective observation. The BAC test is indeed hard evidence, but the prosecution may not be able to use it if it’s tainted by poor handling or administration, or if the original traffic stop was not lawful. In short, there are many possible defenses open to an experienced attorney in a case like this.


